we’re afraid of death.

Baby in Coffin

The Taleban hung a 7-year old . Seven years old! A . Someone’s little boy. Innocence killed. Taken out in his . Death before .

Has death stopped meaning something? Has killling another person, let alone a child become another news listing that we gloss over as we sip our coffees and get ready for the day? Has innocence become nothing more than a favorite past-?

Our culture tends to fear death. Our television commercials mosly are ways in which we can try to death. We are in denial. We don’t want to talk about death because we know how the statistics work out. Our faiths and beliefs might give us some hope. But truly (& abstractly) when it comes down to it we don’t know what is beyond our deaths. That reality makes us afraid of death. But this post isn’t whether you believe there is an after-life. This post is about how we have subsconsciously become victims of a culture that is intentionally denying the reality of all of our futures. Why? Because we like to be in control. We want to be fully aware of our surroundings. Our need for control gives us a false sense of security.

Somehow our denial of death has numbed us to the reality that we are meant to preserve life. The ancient nomadic along with most religions believe that life is sacred. Life is holy. I see that many believe this, but to stop death from happening might cost you your life. Ironically. This fear of losing our lives impedes us from preserving the life of another.

We need to be a people who are dedicated to preserving life.

Not that we need to do this in a colonial sense.

If life is worth preserving than why are there so many headlines saying otherwise?

When we become numb to the death of others, we silently agree that all life is not holy.
When we become numbe to death itself, we selfishly proclaim that we are more important.
When we casually glance across the death of another in a tabloid we agree that that person isn’t worth saving.

May we become a people who selflessly find opportunities to save the lives of others. May we become people who not only speak of life as holy, but live as if live is truly holy. When we do this we become better humans. We embrace what it means to be human. So, what is at least one way we can begin preserving the life of another?*

*beyond campaigning or awareness

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Share

mercy: from the womb to life.

Cat in the box!

when speech fails, visionary may find themselves caught up in ecstasy – Anna Smith

to renew , you must renew terminology — Anna Smith

We all have it in us to love. We all have it in us to shalom. We all have it in us to find and safe spaces for that love to grow. When we do this, we are agreeing that has the last word. But what it ?

“In Jeremiah 2:2 the word chesed is rendered ‘kindness,’ the reference being to ‘the kindness of thy youth,’ and this phrase is paralleled by ‘the love of thine espousals.’ The meaning is not that Israel was more tender in her attitude towards God or in her affections, but that in the first days after the rescue from Egypt she was faithful to the marriage-covenant with God. The charge of the prophets is that Israel’s loyalty to her covenant with God”

The idea of mercy in the Hebrew mind is coupled with justice. Justice is simply defined as setting things right. (Mercy sometimes gets defined as receiving something we didn’t deserve, or being ‘saved’ from something that we should deserve. It tends to get defined within in the context of orthodox salvation. I think we need new words.) Mercy in this new context means that mercy is then an intimate relationship built upon setting things right.

The Kabbalah (a Jewish mystic compilation of wise sayings and aphorisms) states that ‘chesed’ (mercy) is “This is the place of emotional perfection, the place of yearning for union with the absolute.” Although, mercy is sometimes explained as a feeling of favor (very similarly to that of ‘grace’) from God to man, there is also a responsible to demonstrate intimacy and favor throughout humanity. So in this case, mercy is about how we treat the other. How we feel about another person and whether or not what we do with feeling spur us on to help set things right in those people(s) lives. Mercy is an action. Not something that is out there in the sky that we wait for, its something that we bring with us, something that lives out of us. It comes from our bones.

Another hebrew word for mercy is the word for . I know it sounds weird. But what is a ? A place where new life is being formed. A place where very different things are being placed together to make one thing. Organs that are working together to create one body. One body that is alive and breathing. It is a sacred space of all , a sacred space for humanity to become what it is meant to become. Mercy is the of finding ways to get very diverse things to work together as one.

Mercy is about unity. It is the ecstatic expression of what could be. Mercy are words that create worlds and life. God’s act of creation, was an act of mercy (not in the traditional sense). God was demonstrating to us what it looks like to create life out of nothing, essentially this is one of the many lessons of having children. Creating and encouraging life to grow, mature and encourage more life. Mercy is the act of encouraging life. (In its own context, it has nothing to do with the cross; but when placed in context of the cross, mercy than chooses its form in the form of resurrection – new life). Mercy says that the of creation doesn’t have the last word. Mercy says that life has the last word.Mercy is about providing a safe space for growth. A safe space for life to flourish. To do so we have to ingest things that help sustain and create that life. What we ingest will help determine what comes out. Also, its not only when we create life, its also when we encourage others to create life that we become purveyors of mercy. But if we judge, than the life we help create and sustain is a new way to judge others. If we love (another word for mercy) than we help build into live(s) and help sustain them through love. If we choose the former, than we are agreeing that life isn’t sacred as it should be. If we choose to live out of our potential, if we choose to hold and embrace those in need, if we choose to make life than we are people who embrace and perpetuate mercy.

Note: I expound a lot more about this in my second book, coming out in about a year. (I have another one out before then.)

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Share

deconstructing deconstruction that leads to reconstruction

trying to make sense of what we go through tends to be a natural thing that most people want to do. when falls around us, we want to not simply pick up the pieces, we also want to inspect the pieces and know why they fell apart in the first place. our curiosity drives into wonder. we wonder why things didn’t work out and want to make sense of it all. we making sense of it will somehow bring this holistic peace. which isn’t necessarily true.

i think is us. deconstruction compells us to ask questions we might not otherwise. it forces us into corners we intentionally stay out of. it forces us to deal with the areas we have either been told not to interact with or have out of fear never deconstructed before.

deconstructing the , jesus, belief systems, theology and the world around us is perfectly natural to being human. there isn’t anything wrong with deconstruction. we all need to ask the questions we’ve been told we’re not supposed to, not for the sole sake of being defiant, but to learn and unlearn the things we might need divorce ourselves from. it’s not an easy or comfortable process, we might even lose friends and make enemies in the process. but if we never ask questions we either have learned to accept our lot as a victim who allows to happen or we have been brainwashed to think we don’t need to walk outside of the boundaries to see who and what lies beyond.

if we never walk outside of the fences we’ve constructed for ourselves than we will only grow as large as the space that we have conceived for ourselves. questions are essential because they lead us on, the move us, inspire us and even challenge us to see beyond what we think know. deconstruction is about letting go of the systems of belief, coming to realize that salvation isn’t found in systems. that salvation isn’t found in a belief system, but partial-salvation (which means ‘healing’) might be found in the process from deconstruction to reconstruction.

but what if reconstruction isn’t what we think it is?

the word tends to connote the idea of rebuilding, or piecing things back together. what if reconstruction was revisited from a different lens?

maybe reconstruction can be less about rebuilding our ideas, and more about our actions. more about living out our ideas embedded with compassion. reconstruction tends to be more about putting ideas back together, but what i am proposing deconstructing be a part of a life-long . that we hold the art of the question closely and intimately. but that we also see that there is a need for reconstruction. for a putting back together. a time to build and a time to tear down.

but if we can begin to see that reconstruction can be the process that we live out. that our actions define our beliefs. rather than our beliefs (which should always be held loosely) forming us, which seemingly doesn’t work so well. so maybe deconstruction can be ongoing, but reconstruction can be how we choose to live our lives out. for example — we can constantly hold the ethic of while we question the validity of baptism. and so what frames us isn’t whether we believe in baptism, but that is constantly reconstructing with us no matter what we might end believing in. Life is a journey, deconstruction and reconstruction can be the lovely companions that along with us.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Share

man need a little madness

man need a little madness, lest he not cut the rope and be free – Niko Kazankhis

at one we were all travelers. the world was this unwrapped present from the Creator. it would be like opening a window on the first morning, in your house, to find the scenery that was whispering for you to peek through your shutters all night long. life was a , it had to be.

then came settling. finding a place to call your own. colonization. survival. bills. cars. stress. a few of the things that came with settling.

yesterday, i ran into a guy who responded ‘it’s alright’ after I asked him whether he liked where had been living for the last 30 years. i heard the defeat in his voice.

life had become a chore. something that you do.
it bo ecame a list of things to ge done rather than
a ride to experience, maybe he likes his life. but his bod language and word choice seemed to betray that possibility.

maybe we can learn from those who traveled before us.
that we must keep traveling inside. that we can’t stop–when we stop, we resign ourselves to the reality that life is settling for second best. and that we somehow believe the lie that we have been made to live on left-overs. there will be things that will try to steal away our gaze and give us the pseudo-experience that what we are doing feels like what is supposed to be. but there is more. beyond what we have learned, beyond what we have been taught, there is life inviting us into the uknown.

into the ridiculous. into the unreal. into the mystery. some say that life is mystery not because we can’t figure out, but because we were discovery. i the first step on the journey is of the things that slow you down, and then learn to enjoy what is around you, whether its in your control your not.

its not always an easy journey. but its worth it. what is holding you back? what has brought you to where you are? why do you feel the way you feel?

we need to reclaim our souls. maybe this is what salvation is about. find ways to heal and rediscover who we are meant to be. it takes a journey to do that. the unlearning, the forgiving, the dreaming and the reinvention. we were made for adventure, not because i say, but because we have been invited into a life filled with beauty, despair, rainbows, storms, , oceans, and . life is a roller-coaster. hopefully we can enjoy the ride..

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Share

Falling for my gay friend

Meet the author: Neil Christopher is an author, human rights, animal rights and environmental activist, and founder of evolition — an interfaith collective focusing on promoting and empowering the emerging conversation in not only churches, but in other faiths as well. Website: http://www.evolitionist.com

Being friends with gay people is nothing new to me; I never really much about it. Even though I was the son of a pastor and was raised in a very fundamentalist church setting; something never really sat right in my spirit about the way they viewed homosexual and bisexual people, and even though at that time I had no science or to back up my personal convictions – I stuck to them!

My first real encounter was as a Junior in High School. A classmate of mine, that I didn’t really know, “came out” and I found out that he was being attacked for it. It just didn’t sit right with me, so the next day when I walked into the lunchroom and found him sitting alone I came and sat with him. The rest of my friends soon followed suit (I kept good company) and we organized a little “protest” where a bunch of us “straight” guys came to school in drag. First time I ever shaved my chest, and man was that ever itchy. Not recommended.

I have also always been aware of how negative and closed minded gender role stereotypes can be. One of my first girlfriends was always classified by others gay because she was such a tomboy. She looked and acted so much like a boy that when we went out on dates people would drive by yelling “fags” at us for kissing or holding hands. I was also at many times on the other end of that sick because although I attracted to females, I must admit that I am an effeminate male. I don’t play sports, I have a small frame, I love art, music, and was involved in theatre and other such things. I normally got along with girls better than guys, and was always OK with that. I am comfortable in my own skin.

I remember as a Senior having a very popular male athlete in school ask me is I would like to hang out sometime. He was huge, scruffy, attractive… as butch as they get. Nobody would assume that he was gay, but I soon learned that he was. After I explained to him that I was straight, he said he doubted it and that I was just not “out” yet because of my not adhering to certain social roles or expectations. However, he failed to see the irony or the hypocrisy in his assumptions; because there he was, as a very non-effeminate gay male, breaking out of that stereotype but still placing the old ones on me.

It wasn’t until I moved to San Francisco that I really got to see all kinds of walls and boundaries pertaining to this issue come down and get removed. To be honest, over there I never really knew who was what, and was pleased to be living in a place where none of us really gave a damn.

It was here that I also learned something else about homosexuality – if it really is to be taken as a valid expression of love then the same rules apply to it as heterosexuality. Being gay does not mean that you have to be promiscuous; that’s just being promiscuous. Being gay does not mean that you have to be effeminate or butch; that’s an entirely different matter all together. Being gay does not mean that someone is loose or perverted; no more than being straight makes us all faithful saints to our partners and respectful sexually to others. That’s just people being people, and has nothing to do with their sexuality.

It also means (and I know I may piss off a few people here) that if there are people out there living a heterosexual lifestyle due to “nurture” but who were actually born gay and are in the closet, that there are also cases where “nurture” has influenced people who were born straight into a homosexual lifestyle.

Now, please don’t get me wrong. I do believe and know that people are born gay or born straight. I know the ethics and the science behind that, and even before I knew the facts I already knew that in my heart. All I am saying is that since homosexuality is on an even playing filed with heterosexuality that it is possible for this situation to occur equally in both circumstances. I see no difference between the two forms of expression and therefore don’t apply different rules to them both. If I did, that would not be equality.

For example, I became friends with a girl in Arizona who identified as a lesbian, but later on expressed interest in me and decided that she must actually be bisexual, and later as straight. We dated, and through getting to know her I soon learned that she never had a real impulse or attraction to females until much later on in her life where a certain circumstance happened that made her distrust men. She now in this day identifies herself as straight. I do not believe this to be the standard, but is a case of a valid exception.

To be fair, we would have to also assume that the opposite is true as well. That there are certain people who were born gay but who are drawn into a heterosexual lifestyle from social pressure, upbringing, fear, religion, past hurts in a homosexual lifestyle, abuse or some other matter. We have a term for this (being in the closet) and a term for getting out of this bad situation (coming out), but many fail to validate and give merit to those on the opposite side of this predicament.

For persons trapped in either side of the closet, I hope that all we really want is for this person to come to love themselves, be happy, and live in an environment where they are free to be who they are: gay, straight or bi. It should be out goal to live in a society where people are free to be happy in their sexual self-expression either way, and it should not be seen as losing one from our team or gaining one to the other. There’s just one team – the human race.

I must admit though, that as open-minded as I am, and as supportive of that I am, I still have no clue what it would be like to be gay. I care, but I can’t exactly relate. As a human though, we can all identify with our common feelings of pain, loneliness, love, fear, rejection, desire and more recently the frustration that comes from not being able to express or fulfill those desires.

Let me explain… I have a crush on my gay friend. And there is nothing I can do about it.

We can’t choose who we are attracted to, no more than we can choose what colors, smells or foods we like. Not more than we can control when we are hungry, or what we hunger for. It just kind of happens, and it is anything but logical. For if it were logical, I’d just pick or decide to be attracted to someone who could assure me that they would be a good mate to me and fulfill some list of criteria that I have – being straight and actually attracted to me would be pretty high up on that list.

But there I was, minding my own business and enjoying a slam poetry night at a local bar with some friends, when she walked in. I noticed her as soon as the door opened, and just couldn’t take my eyes off her. I’m sure my jaw dropped, and my heart skipped – it raced even more as to my surprise she made her way to where we were all sitting. Oh my God, she knows my friends? And she joined us for the rest of the event.

As she plopped down on the bench and sat cross legged, as I do but unlike all the others, I immediately thought that this was my kind of person. Her shoes were even low-top Vans – hell I even liked the way she smoked and held her cigarette. Was she beautiful? Yes. Was this just physical attraction? No. No I can tell you with all certainty that it was not just that. Yes, she had physical features I find appealing, but many people do and that is not something I generally concentrate on. I don’t have a “type.”

It had more to do with some kind of instinct, emotion, or a gut feeling that she was just a like-spirit. It is more unexplainable that that. And then just to notice the way she sat, talked, smiled, dressed… the way she carried herself – gave out hints and a window into her personality, outlook or “self” that was even more appealing to me. It’s more like meeting someone and immediately knowing that you like them, and then the rest of the conversation/meeting is why.

Oh, but we had not actually talked yet. I was too nervous for that.

We did eventually talk, and for me this is the point when meeting any new person that attraction flies out the window. No matter what I “feel” towards a person upon instinct or first observation, once they open up their mouths and speak if they are boring, annoying, conceited, stupid or ignorant, I no longer hold any kind of attraction towards them. Most pretty people become surprising ugly once they actually speak.

Fortunately (or unfortunately, depending) this was not the case. She was engaging, captivating, and we soon delved into a conversation so deep and long that the others at the table soon dismissed themselves to find other things to do. By the end of the night, I never assumed that I had found a girl that was interested in me (because I am never that cocky), but I had been assured that I found an awesome new person whose company I certainly did enjoy and that I wanted to know more. But yes, attraction was there – although only from my viewpoint.

For as the group gathered together again to pay our tabs and walk out of the bar, her and another friend of mine grabbed hands and walked out together. Once on the street they embraced, and I came to the realization that her and my friend were dating. Not only is this person taken; not only by a friend of mine, but this friend also happens to be a female. So triple whammy: taken, by friend, and is gay.

I felt kind of stupid and embarrassed. But not shocked. I am very used to everything in life, and was at fault for assuming not only that she was straight, but also that since she was talking to me that this automatically meant there was some kind of interest on her part.

It is a very dumb, male attribute, to assume that just because you meet an awesome person of the opposite sex and feel some kind of connection to them that this for some reason means you are supposed to screw them.

I mean, we meet cool people all the time, and it is not like we apply this same “logic” the rest of the great individuals we meet. I have met many males with whom I felt were like-minded spirits, but did I try to screw them? No. Or what about a much older or much younger person? Not at all. So I slapped myself upside the head for falling into the trap of douche-bag male, and decided that I would place attraction aside and if this person still wanted to get to know me as just a person, that I was totally game for that.

Some time has gone by since then, and I never really thought about “liking” her again. That was simply off limits, and I have been really enjoying getting to know her as a person. The more we talked and hung out the more I knew my first instincts were right – she is simply an amazing person and I’m so happy to know her. I look forward to seeing her, love to hear what she has to say in any conversation, and when having a bad night out I seem to pick up as soon as she enters the room. Once we get talking about life, religion, politics… whatever – it lasts for hours and hours on end. I always walk away from those moments feeling better as a person for it and thrilled to simply know her.

Something happened though a few nights ago. We always hang out in public, in group settings, but the other night we just hung out alone for the first time at my place. I didn’t really think about it, but I was nervous. It was not some conscious thing, but I cleaned the house, made sure I looked halfway decent, and was a bundle of nerves. When she first came in it even took me a while to feel comfortable enough to sit down on the same couch as her. I felt very awkward, but I could not figure out why. It’s just my buddy who came over. So what’s all the fuss about?

Eventually I chilled out, and we got to our normal talking and swapping of life stories. Towards the end of the night the topic switched to her personal story of “coming out”; what lead to that, her life before that, and her life as it is now.

She talked about trying to be with guys before, and how some of them were perfectly nice guys; attractive, loving, caring, and faithful – whatever. But how there was just always something missing, incomplete, and something in her gut that was never happy, until now of course. I was trying to relate it that, as best as I could as a straight person, but I didn’t really “get it”… yet. I had sympathy but not empathy.

The conversation then changed to sexual tension and frustration. She spent some time trying to explain to me how hard it is for a gay person to really be able to express themselves in this we live in. I mean, imaging living in a where you feel as though you can’t out on some of the simplest, base desires? To be that kid in High School who feels attracted to your friend of the same sex but is too afraid to even let them know. To be afraid of how they would take it, of how it could end the friendship, of knowing that it is off limits – imagine the amount of frustration and the swallowing of emotions that must take place; the suppression.

Imagine having a desire that you feel as though you can’t act out on, and not a bad one, but one as pure and simple as love itself. Imagine feeling as though it would be wrong to do it, and living in a society where the odds are that the other person will probably not feel the same way. To make it even worse, one where still many people today treat it as though it is a sickness – that it makes you either a bad person, or at least a broken one in need of some fixing.

It was then that I was hit with a realization that quickly moved me sympathy to empathy. Because as I looked at her I realized that, despite whatever I had told myself going into this, I was still attracted to her.

I felt empathy, because I realized that I know, I know without a shadow of a doubt that I feel this but can never act out on it. She will never feel the same way, I have been hiding it, suppressing it, and it has been eating me up inside. I too have been living a bit of a lie. I also understood at that moment that just as I can never the fact that I am attracted to her, she can never the fact that she is attracted to women, and never will be to me. I saw her, for a brief second, as a male that I was attracted to who was only attracted to females and felt a glimpse of something I never really understood before.

I cannot mentally will these feelings away, or replace it with logic; no more than she can will herself into an emotion for me or any other man. Hell, considering the times we live in and the amount of pressure and oppression to gay culture if they could, wouldn’t many have “willed away” certain feelings? For me the only risk is a bit of a broken heart, but for them it can mean a loss of family, religion, friends, jobs, fear, hate, insults and even physical harm. No. Nobody chooses to be gay.

Am I a crappy friend for finding this person attractive? Do I need to feel guilt for a certain uncontrollable impulse or emotion? For being wired the way that I am wired? I think not. No more than they can help or control their non-interest in, have no reason to feel bad over it, and cannot change or control their situation or feelings.

I have always been friends with, supportive of, and an advocate for the gay community. But it has always been as an outsider, as someone who has no way of fully understanding what it is that you are going through. And I am still that outsider, but today I can tell you that I understand a little bit more; because we are all humans, and we all share the same basic human needs and emotions. I don’t understand the scale of the things you are going though, but I know what it is like to love, to want to be accepted, desired, to feel pain, rejection or fear.

I believe in a God who loves us all, and I am thankful for this and many other life-lessons Life has put me through to turn me into a more compassionate individual. I believe that God is always trying to work in this world in different ways to about positive change in the way we humans all get along and deal with one another. I believe that He/She is always speaking; I only pray that more people begin to listen.

So what’s next for me and my friend? I don’t really know. I have to get over the fact that I desire them and enjoy their company as a human being. I don’t believe that’s “settling” more than evolving. Hopefully they will be patient with me, and understand that there is nothing I can do about my attraction for females no more than they can do anything about their attraction towards females. Hell, there’s yet one more thing we have in common.

Thanks God for the life lesson, but maybe next time you can just send a good book my way or something? This one stung a little bit.

Meet the author: Neil Christopher is an author, human rights, animal rights and environmental activist, and founder of evolition — an interfaith collective focusing on promoting and empowering the emerging conversation in not only Christian churches, but in other faiths as well. Website: http://www.evolitionist.com

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Share

scandalous electricity.

Make love not war

alive /əˈlaɪv/ Show Spelled[uh-lahyv]

–adjective 1.
having life; living; existing; not dead or lifeless.

2.

living (used for emphasis): the proudest man alive.

3.

in a state of action; in force or operation; active: to keep alive.

4.

full of energy and spirit; lively: Grandmother’s more alive than most of her contemporaries.

5.

having the quality of life; vivid; vibrant: The room was alive with color.

6.

Electricity. live2 (def. 17).
a few years i back i had a friend of mine look at the current state of her life, which was that her car had broke down on the side of the freeway, she was losing her job, and her and her boyfriend had just split-up! and her reaction makes perfect sense, she said: ” my life is falling apart!”
i think if i was in her , i might have responded the same. ever sense that and her words though, it has made me think about how we define our alives, or even what it means to be alive. we tend to look like the woman above did to inanimate things, lifeless things as objects that determine how valuable our life is or isn’t. for some, their life worth is determined whether they get this one job, or if they make it on American Idol, or if their refrigerator breaks down and they have to buy groceries all over again!
i don’t want to minimize the importance of the events above or even seem to trivialize events like them, but i do want us to see how we have come to define life. that for most of us we get into the ruts because things aren’t working out the way we think they should. and because the events or objects aren’t working to our presupposed maximum expectations, than our lives either don’t make sense or we feel less alive. so for most of us, alive isn’t about breathing, its about being in control. when we are in control of our , and things goes ‘as planned’ (which really means: ‘how i want them to go’) then we feel alive. we enjoy life. but when it doesn’t we feel like we’ve lost our electricity. we’ve lost our juice, our fire for life has left.
the ancient hebrew poets believed that as we breathe in and breathe out that we were inhaling and exhaling the holy breath that gave each of us. that each breathe was a holy and recognition that we are not only on borrowed breath, but that we can proclaim together that we ‘alive!’ electricity is a surge of life. it brings life into wherever it is. it sustains life. for us to embrace our electricity means we also bring that electricity into the lives of others. it means we see that life isn’t summed up by what we have, dont’ have or how in control we are. that to be alive means to be fully aware. fully responsible with the divine of breathing we have been given for our 75 years.
In the ‘Holy Man’, Eddie Murphy plays a guru who shares some of his wisdom, one part of the shows him talking to the audience on the frailty of life and that the realization of who short is, spurs us to do something — now! listen in:
“Seventy-five years. That’s
how much time you get if you’re lucky.
 

Being alive means being alive right now. we don’t wait to be alive. we are alive. how we choose to live it helps determine how alive we are while we are still breathing. there always going to be things distracting, creating fear, creating  joy even, but being alive means we have to make choices.

being alive means we accept the to be alive. to breathe in and breathe out. go ahead, breathe in and breathe out. and then go and find ways to incarnate that respiration. find ways to engage with the world. with others, strangers, family members, flowers, trees, books, songs. jump into the scandalous electricity that is life!!

 
Seventy-five years.
Seventy-five winters…

 
seventy-five springtimes, seventy-five
summers and seventy-five autumns.

 
When you look at it like that,
it’s not a lot of time, is it?

 
Don’t waste them.
Get your head out of the rat race…

 
and forget about the superficial things
that preoccupy your existence…

 
and get back
to what’s important now.

 
Right now, this very second.”

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Share

a new article over at distrubed christians

check it out, leave a comment..

http://www.disturbedchristians.com/2010/03/-of-presumption.html

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Share

the end of the story

Hipster

i don’t know about you, but i am one of those people who like to tell whole story. yep, i am one of those ones who likes to tell someone end of movie even if they haven’t seen movie yet. it’s like eating a and not finishing it. or cracking open a can of whatever you drink of choice is and leaving it to go flat. or not eating your vegetables but eating everything else, grant it, they may taste nasty but they are good for you. sometimes, not very often, i read end of a book first. but, to be honest, i feel like i am cheating on book. or drink or sandwich. because i am meant to experience it. not have it all figured out or consumed. and best thing about is that you really don’t get to fully enjoy it the experience until after you have seen it. for the most part, and as i am getting older, i am becoming more comfortable with the idea of not knowing the end of the story (at times i still struggle with it). but i have always enjoyed a journey. that’s not a metaphor, is a journey we get to be a part of. it’s beautiful, scandalous, fragmented and utterly inviting. and if i spend all my time waiting for ‘what’s on the otherside’, i won’t get to experience what is here. what is now. i won’t get to taste and see , because i am wondering what the next dish is. and essentially what is at the core of a lot of theology that i learned growing up was, wait till the next meal. get excited about the end of the movie. when in reality, we don’t know what happens at the end of the movie. most people that get to ‘see’ the end of the movie don’t come back and tell us about it. sure, there might be a few verses in the ancient scriptures that might hint about it, each religion has their own mythology about it (when i say myth, i don’t lies or fables, i the powerful narrative that is deeply embedded within our society and history — that carries us along and something we get to help rewrite). but just because their are stories about it, does it we spend all of our time thinking about it. when you know the end before the story ends, you don’t get to really enjoy the story now.(don’t get me , i think there is a place, reality, relationship waiting for us one day when, but i think there is more to life then what happens then). i we can come to a place where our lives were written to be a part of the story now. in this in history. you are breathing for the very purpose to be . you have been animated to bring life into every you get to experience. i you do. i i do.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Share

what ‘the sea inside’ can teach us about euthanasia or are the church losing customers?

i am just watching the “The Sea Inside” about a quadraplegic author who would prefer to die rather than live.

i always struggle with this notion of and choice. because is so beautiful and itriguing to live and be a part of and the idea of shortening that beauty seems to reduce the experience of to nothing more than death. but then i come to this place where if the quality of is fractured and fragmented than is that at all. and i think it comes down to one defines what life is. because life isn’t always the roses we see that grow in springtime. it is a beautiful sea, but it can also be a raging one. and so maybe life is about well we live whatever experience we are handed, well we choose to participate in the life we live i think helps determine not only well we live but also what we contribute while we are alive. i am in a quandry with all of this…

below is a portion of the script from the movie the sea inside and is a conversation between a jesuit priest and the paraplegic character () wanting to die. and makes a comment about how the church has used the idea of death as a tool to get ‘customers’, which i think when you think about, especially in light of the reality that the word ‘hell’ was used as rhetoric by the Pharisees to attempt to convert people. but it was more a way of life people could live, not so much a place of destruction and death that those who didn’t say a prayer would go to. i think it is important to understand words like hell, , satan and other parts of the scripture within their first-century context and what they meant then and how they have come to mean what they mean now…

Go upstairs and tell Ramon

…and since we are inside eternity.
Life doesn’t belong to us…

and we take to ridiculous extremes the
bourgeois definition of private property

You are killing me

But if Church was the first one in
secularizing the private property

- I can’t tell him that
- How come?

Should I tell him that?

Freedom to choose my beliefs…no,
his beliefs and decide over his life

Ok, now you tell him

Why does the Church keep that posture
of terror of death with such passion?

Because it knows that it would lose
a great amount of its customers

if people lose their fear to the Great Beyond

He reminds you that according to the polls,
% of the Spanish are in favor of euthanasia

Very well, very well. Now you tell him that
moral issues are not resolved through polls

Because most of the German
people were also in favor of Hitler

Now he is going to compare
me to Hitler. That is very rude

No, not that

Ask him what Hitler has to do with all this

No wait… Padre Francisco, do you hear me?

Yes. Ramon I can hear you

Why do you mix pears with apples?

I hope you didn’t come here to do demagoguery.

Because you Jesuits know a lot about that.

No, no. Of course not.

But since you up
demagoguery, my dear Ramon.

Don’t you think that what’s really
demagogic, is to say “Death with dignity”

Why don’t you leave the euphemisms aside
and call things by its name, with all its rawness

“l take my life” and that’s it…

Your interest in me keeps surprising me,
while the institution that you represent

accepts the death penalty and condemned
those who didn’t think the right way,
to the bonfire for centuries

Now you are the one doing demagoguery

Yes of course, but leaving the euphemisms
aside, as you say that’s what you
would have done with me, right?

Burn me alive

Burn me for defending my freedom

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Share

time isn't linear: a philosophy

if was linear then would only be about progression. depending on how you define progression, might be in your favor if it is not linear. if it is linear then the processes we become a part of are already patterned and have a framework before we even get our hands on it. which in some sense means all of life is already mapped out. every breath. every glance. every . it’s all coordinated for you to live. the progression of your beliefs and how far they go, yep those too. how many children you have, who you marry is already in that process waiting for you to follow the linear path. Yet, thought postulates something different, and poses that time is circular. Hebrew thought also states that time being linear is a Western idea. In the book of Genesis (when translated from the Hebrew) presupposes there was another ‘world’ or part of before as we know it. Follow the link above to find other examples. Olber’s Paradox assumes because we can only visually see the stars that time has to be linear. (Click link to find out more). But this solely based on what we can and cannot see. But, If time is linear then your death is the end of your life. the end of all life. depending on what your narrative you subscribe to, you could go to Valhalla, finally reach Nirvana, come back as someone’s couch, go to heaven or help usher in a new kind Kingdom that will in its own time arrive on the scene when its all ready. There are many more options. But if we believe time is only linear than we have already shortened the span of our life and therefore our potential as people, as created beings, and as humanity. If time is a circle as most ancient Eastern religions assumed than life isn’t about following a progression, it becomes about discovering who we were meant to be, it doesn’t become about this one day when all things fall down and God sorts everyone out. It becomes about being agents of hope and peace, grace and love, restoring humanity and the divine, finding God in the everyday. It becomes more about a romance and less about the process. It becomes about using this infinite freedom to be Christ in all places at all times. It becomes about transformational living than living moment-by-moment.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
Share
Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.